|
PLURAL VERSUS SINGULAR MEASUREMENTS
RATIONALE Wow! I actually remembered to write
this. The wonders will never cease. The main thesis in this treatise will seek
to explain my rationale for using the plural relative to measuring distance,
diameter, weight, and volume. When I worked in the engineering field
for 29 years, there was always a controversial area germane to measuring
various things. I continually clashed with engineers, mathematicians and other
fellow travelers. Like most of my views, I have always stood alone in most
cases. I shall now state my contention. When
one measures something, one must use the plural when the measurement is more
than 1 unit. Let me use an example. The following controversial examples went
on for 29 years. As part of my job, I often had to measure diameters of various
pipes such as culverts. If, for example, the diameter measured 48 inches i.e. 4 feet, I would always say it is a
4 feet pipe. The other engineers would say, "No,
it is a 4 foot pipe or 48 inch pipe." I would insist on feet or inches
and would both orally and written refer to the plural. Now, follow my rationale. Look at your
feet right now. You will see 2 FEET. If you cover one of your feet, what do you
now see? One FOOT. Am I not correct? Of course I am. Now, relative to the
"foot" measure, our system of measure is based someone's foot size
back in antiquity. Therefore, as I just pointed out, the plural of
"foot" is "feet" which is more than one "foot". I
think we call can agree on that, I trust. Now, if something is 4 feet, that is
the plural of "foot". If something is exactly 1 foot, than it is one
foot in length. Can we all agree on that? All right, if a culvert is more than
1 foot in diameter, it is referred to as "feet" correct. Now let us apply this same rationale for
other measurements. If some thing weighs 1 ton, that is the singular, if
something weighs more than 1 ton, that is plural, correct? So then, if
something weighs 4 tons, then it is 4 tons! Not 4 "ton". It always
aggravates me when someone refers to more than 1 ton as "ton", i.e., that culvert weighs 4
"ton". UGGGHHH Now, I will take an example of
inconsistency of the people who ague with me about the plural. If something
contains 1 ounce, it is singular. If some thing contains more than 1 ounce,
then my position states it has to be the plural, i.e. "ounces". These
same "singular people" always refer to it as ounces. For
example, they say that glass has 3 ounces of liquid in it. Ah Huhhh! I then
point out their inconsistency, which proves my contention! Get it? Whenever, I
pointed out this blatant inconsistency, all the other engineers would ignore it
and insist on using their incorrect references. In conclusion, I believe their
insistence in continuing their errors is based on a lifetime of incorrect usage
of others. I have always stood contrary to the "herd mentality". I
have always been my own man and have never followed the crowd especially when I
know I'm right. Oh Uhhh! It just occurred to me that I forgot to take my
morning pills. I have to take 6 PILLS every morning, NOT 6 PILL. I REST MY CASE... |